A) Engel v. Vitale CORRECT Engel v. Vitale (1962) is the correct answer because it directly addressed the constitutionality of school-sponsored prayer. The Supreme Court ruled that the state-composed prayer, even if voluntary and non-denominational, violated the Establishment Clause. This case is a cornerstone of First Amendment jurisprudence and is frequently tested on civics exams. The decision reinforced the principle that public schools cannot endorse or promote religious activities, ensuring religious neutrality in the public education system.
B) Texas v. Johnson INCORRECT Texas v. Johnson (1989) dealt with the burning of the American flag as a form of symbolic speech protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court held that flag burning constitutes expressive conduct and is protected by the Free Speech Clause. This case is unrelated to school prayer and focuses on the extent of free speech protections, not the Establishment Clause.
C) Wisconsin v. Yoder INCORRECT Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) addressed the conflict between compulsory school attendance laws and the free exercise of religion. The Supreme Court ruled that Amish parents could not be compelled to send their children to public school beyond the eighth grade, as it infringed on their religious beliefs. This case is about the Free Exercise Clause, not the Establishment Clause, and does not involve school-sponsored prayer.
D) Dred Scott v. Sandford INCORRECT Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) was a pre-Civil War case concerning slavery and citizenship. The Supreme Court infamously ruled that African Americans were not U.S. citizens and that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories. This case is unrelated to the First Amendment and has no bearing on school prayer, making it an incorrect choice.